SPEAKING OUT ON VALUES AND VIEWS OF ARCHAEOLOGY IN NORTH AMERICA.
Dear friends, colleagues, art collectors, and moderates,
My name
is Fred Van Ronk, Professional Archaeologist/Anthropologist with a degree
from Washington State University. I currently reside in Kalama, Washington
overlooking the beautiful and mighty Columbia River. Kalama is a small town
with a population of 2500 people in southwest Washington State. Kalama’s
county seat is in Kelso WA, located in Cowlitz County roughly 10 miles north
of my residence.
At age 9
some 55 years ago I found my first arrowhead. That initial find turned out
to be the catalyst of my life, carrying me forward in the pursuit of a deep
cultural understanding of the Columbia River peoples and their art. As my
passion grew, so did my extensive collection of Columbia River art and
artifacts to the current volume of over 14,000 catalogued, site specific,
museum quality pieces which I still own to the present day. Early on I began
documenting each and every find, including stratum data, lithic chronology,
and site location specific data which has now yielded one of the most
extensive documented collections of Columbia River art in existence. The
artifacts collected range from sites near the small town of Bridgeport,
Washington to the estuary of the Columbia River below Longview Washington.
Recently, I have been besieged with e-mails, letters, and phone calls from
anti-private collection advocates, expressing their distaste and dismay for
people who retain and curate private collections of Columbia River lithic
material, who also sell art and artifacts, and the legal issues pertaining
to the federal and state seizure of private collections. At this point we
wish to make it very clear that we are not attorneys, but have a reasonable
knowledge and understanding of the laws governing the acquisition and
retention of Native American artifacts from Washington and Oregon. It’s our
duty to report that both states DO NOT HAVE LAWS
FORBIDDING PRIVATE COLLECTIONS that were found before 1979 and 1984.
We will state in the following
editorial what we at Columbia River Ancient Resources, Columbiariverman.com,
and Fred & Janet Van Ronk believe are the issues. We ask everyone to
dedicate the necessary time to carefully read and examine the facts, and
base their judgment on the correlation thereof. (“Minds are like parachutes
they only work when they’re open”) Some of our views will be very critical
of both sides relating to the field and study of archaeology/anthropology.
The bare
bones distinction between one philosophical viewpoint and another center
simply around one group believing it unethical to privately own, possess,
sell, market, curate, and or view privately Native American Artifacts and
art, and one side that clearly disagrees with this assessment. There are
however, numerous individuals who believe the opposite, and believe that
privately owned art and artifacts is ethical and works toward a balance and
a critique of the publicly owned and possessed art and artifacts. Yet, we
only support legal acquisition and ownership of artifacts according to
Federal and State laws and the acquisition and ownership before 1979 by
private collectors and others is indeed legal.
The
history of the human race centers around our ability to decipher the past
and gain knowledge from the lithic debitage and art left from
ALL of our
ancestors. We disagree with the notion that Native American
tribal peoples should be exempt from public and or private scientific
analysis. Other great cultures of the earth including ancient Greece,
Babylon, Rome, China, Egypt, Celts etc. etc. have all allowed the
exploration of their cultural heritage. In many cases
private scientific advocates have funded, explored and shared
with the world their findings. Likewise some of the most extravagant
discoveries in the history of world archaeology have stemmed from the dreams
of the amateur embarking on the epic quests that lead to the discovery of
Troy and Mediterranean discoveries on Crete buried by the Santorini Volcano.
One of the highest calling of man
is the public and
private right to study the human experience
in all the aspects. The study cannot be limited or divided by
ethnic back ground, religion or race, just as the rights of this great
nation are rights applied to all peoples.
The
passionate views of this forum are born from a clear understanding of the
absolute critical importance to understand the cultural contributions
Pacific Northwest archaeology and anthropology provide. The truly sad thing
is many lobby groups and tribal affiliates have painted a tainted picture of
what it means to truly understand the culture existing in this area for a
minimum of the last 13,000 years. Left wing lobbyists have now conveyed a
message through the political forum clearly stating
“privately
owning culturally affiliated materials from these ancestral tribal
lands constitutes infringement of Native American Rights.” I say
to the contrary that is completely un-true, and only through the clear
understanding of in-dept scientific analysis by the public and private
sectors of this material and art may we truly fill the gaps of our
understanding of early and late entry migration strategies and population
growth relating to the true understanding of the archaeological,
anthropological, and ethnographic record.
The key
factor in obtaining this record is correctly conducting the gathering,
cataloguing, analysis, and possession of this lithic material. At Columbia
River Ancient Resources we have gone to great lengths to also expose the
public sectors mismanagement of the “resources entrusted in the care” of the
Universities and other governmental agencies. In the last 20-50 years many
of these Universities and agencies have created an agenda around satisfying
certain left wing affiliate groups. They have received lobbying monies to
set a certain agenda prohibiting the study through the private sector of the
human experience.
We have
also documented the countless examples of mismanagement of archaeological
and anthropological resources in the public sector and universities. There
have literally been thousands of excavations by these well known
universities and governmental agencies claiming to have specific tribe’s
best interests in mind. These agencies have lost hundreds of thousands of
hours of archaeological data and cultural remains due to the miss-management
of the process as well as the lack of funding to support and manage Cultural
Resources. If you don’t believe what I’m saying please research the
processes and practices that occurred during the installation of the
dams and reservoirs within the Columbia River system. Then please, ask
for a concise inventory and reportage of the materials discovered during
that process. You will find countless examples of artifacts and data being
lost to the wind. In some cases items now 20-50 years in storage boxes from
excavation within the Pacific Northwest are being rediscovered with
provenience all but lost or the best artifacts removed by someone within the
agencies for personal gain. Again, we point out that our public sector has
failed, failed in management, inventory, and publishing of archaeological
data for all to share.
In
closing our message is simply this: All who curate in the public and
private sectors first must have the right to do so, but they must also be
responsible for the cultural resources entrusted in their care. ALL must
retain the provenience of site specific materials, and it is our
recommendation to retain site specific materials. It is our recommendation
to retain site specific materials in a manner conductive to future learning
and cultural understanding. Dealing artifacts
simply for financial gain is against the best
interest of human kind and our personal beliefs.
However, where provenience has been lost, to promote
better understanding marketing this non-provenance material to the public
should continue to be legal.
Many
an artifact, fossil, mineral, and other related geo-archaeological art in
the possession of a young student public or private has started many quests
leading to the greatest discoveries of the human experience. It must not be
limited to public agencies or just private groups any more than to one
geographic area or another. We ALL need to acknowledge the vital works and
contributions done by private amateurs and amateur groups such as the
Mid-Columbia Archaeological Society, Oregon Archaeological Society,
Washington Archaeological Society and others. The Pacific Northwest holds
many of the most critical keys to understanding “how we all arrived here”
and as we continue to discover, possess, learn, and share we will all be one
step closer to un-locking the true secrets of mankind.
Fred Van
Ronk
Archaeologist/Anthropologist
Columbia
River Ancient Resources Curator, of Ancient History
Charter
Member Mid-Columbia Archaeological Society and Co-Fonder of such Group
Member of
Oregon Archaeological Society
Member of
American Amateur Archaeologist Society
Member of
Authentic Artifact Collectors of America
Member
of ArrowPack
Member
of ACA of N.W.
Member
of AS of America
Another’s
Societies of Anthropology and Archaeology of The World.
Kalama,
Washington, 98625
P.O.Box
1009
YOUR COMMENTS ARE
WELCOME.
PLEASE SEND TO:
Please e-mail us for more information:
columbiariverman@msn.com or
write
us:
COLUMBIA RIVER ANCIENT RESOURCES (TM.)